Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -AssetTrainer
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-23 01:33:22
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (43289)
Related
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- A thrift store shopper snags lost N.C. Wyeth painting worth up to $250,000 for just $4
- Civil rights lawsuit in North Dakota accuses a white supremacist group of racial intimidation
- United Airlines resumes flights following nationwide ground stop
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Heavy rain in areas of Spain leads to flooding, stranded motorists and two deaths: Reports
- Military funerals at risk in Colorado due to dwindling number of volunteers for ceremonies
- Suspect indicted on attempted murder charge in explosives attack on Japan’s Kishida, report says
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Chiefs’ All-Pro TE Travis Kelce hyperextends knee in practice for opener vs Detroit
Ranking
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Alex Murdaugh's lawyers accuse court clerk of jury tampering and demand new trial
- Fierce storm in southern Brazil kills at least 21 people and displaces more than 1,600
- 23 people injured after driver crashes car into Denny’s restaurant in Texas
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner’s Second Daughter’s Initials Revealed
- Estrogen is one of two major sex hormones in females. Here's why it matters.
- Novak Djokovic beats Taylor Fritz at the US Open to reach his record 47th Grand Slam semifinal
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Steve Williams becomes 1st Democrat to enter West Virginia governor’s race
Military funerals at risk in Colorado due to dwindling number of volunteers for ceremonies
Kia, Ford, Harley-Davidson among 611,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
There have been more mass shootings than days in 2023, database shows
The Ultimatum's Riah Nelson Is Pregnant, Expecting Baby With Trey Brunson
Arizona superintendent to use COVID relief for $40 million tutoring program