Current:Home > StocksThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -AssetTrainer
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:29:15
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (6134)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Promising new gene therapies for sickle cell are out of reach in countries where they’re needed most
- Virginia 4th graders fall ill after eating gummy bears contaminated with fentanyl
- Preparations to deploy Kenyan police to Haiti ramp up, despite legal hurdles
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Amazon won’t have to pay hundreds of millions in back taxes after winning EU case
- China’s economy is forecast to slow sharply in 2024, the World Bank says, calling recovery ‘fragile’
- Maalik Murphy is in the transfer portal, so what does this mean for the Texas Longhorns?
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Far-right Polish lawmaker Grzegorz Braun douses menorah in parliament
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- War crimes court upholds the conviction of a former Kosovo Liberation Army commander
- Why Twilight’s Taylor Lautner and Robert Pattinson “Never Really Connected on a Deep Level”
- Bucks, Pacers square off in dispute over game ball after Giannis’ record-setting performance
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Discovery inside unearthed bottle would’ve shocked the scientist who buried it in 1879
- NFL Week 15 picks: Will Cowboys ride high again vs. Bills?
- Taylor Lautner Shares Insight Into 2009 Breakup With Taylor Swift
Recommendation
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
A judge may rule on Wyoming’s abortion laws, including the first explicit US ban on abortion pills
Fireworks on New Year's Eve send birds into a 'panicked state,' scientists discover
Rooney Rule hasn't worked to improve coaching diversity. But this new NFL program might
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Former British soldier to stand trial over Bloody Sunday killings half a century ago
Hugh Grant hopes his kids like 'Wonka' after being 'traumatized' by 'Paddington 2'
Court voids fine given to Russian activist for criticizing war and sends case back to prosecutors