Current:Home > StocksCharles H. Sloan-U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules -AssetTrainer
Charles H. Sloan-U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 10:52:00
A federal appeals court will allow partial access to the abortion drug mifepristone while a high-profile federal case plays out,Charles H. Sloan but with new limitations on how the drug can be dispensed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit says the drug, used in most medication abortions in the United States, remains approved for use up to seven weeks of pregnancy while the case is being appealed.
Previously, the drug was approved for up to 10 weeks. The ruling also says mifepristone can no longer be sent in the mail at least for now.
The Biden administration says it will appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk sided with anti-abortion rights groups that sued the Food and Drug Administration over its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. He issued a ruling that would invalidate the drug's approval beginning this Friday unless the appeals court intervenes.
On Monday, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit for an emergency stay of Kacsmaryk's decision while the court hears the case. In their request, Justice Department lawyers argued that "the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA's approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court's own misguided assessment of the drug's safety."
Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and is now used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, in nearly all medication abortions in the United States. Mifepristone was initially approved for medication abortion through seven weeks of pregnancy, but in 2016, the FDA expanded that to 10 weeks.
The appeals court's decision means mifepristone will continue to be at least partially available while the case plays out.
It's unclear how the latest decision will interact with a ruling in a separate federal case in Washington state, filed by attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia who are seeking to preserve access to the pills.
In that decision, also issued Friday shortly after Kacsmaryk released his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice said the FDA was prohibited from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone."
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, one of the leaders of that effort, told NPR he believes it will preserve access to mifepristone for people in those 17 states and D.C., unless a higher court says otherwise.
The Justice Department also filed a motion Monday asking Rice to clarify the meaning of his ruling, given there appears to be "tension" with Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunction.
On Thursday evening, Rice issued an order affirming that for the 17 states and D.C. — the parties in the case before him — access to mifepristone should remain unchanged, regardless of the Texas judge's injunction and the Fifth Circuit's decision. So these cases remain on a collision course.
A Supreme Court decision could clarify the path forward.
Meanwhile, several states led by Democratic governors have begun stockpiling abortion pills — either mifepristone or another drug, misoprostol. Misoprostol is usually used in combination with mifepristone but can be used alone to induce abortion.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have announced that their states have begun stockpiling mifepristone in the event that access is disrupted. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say their states are stockpiling tens of thousands of doses of misoprostol.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Hidden Viruses And How To Prevent The Next Pandemic
- Booming Plastics Industry Faces Backlash as Data About Environmental Harm Grows
- U.S. Taxpayers on the Hook for Insuring Farmers Against Growing Climate Risks
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Demi Moore and Emma Heming Willis Fiercely Defend Tallulah Willis From Body-Shamers
- Trump delivered defiant speech after indictment hearing. Here's what he said.
- What Ariana Madix's Vanderpump Rules Co-Stars Really Think of Her New Man Daniel Wai
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Greenland’s Ice Melt Is in ‘Overdrive,’ With No Sign of Slowing
Ranking
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Ariana Grande’s Rare Tribute to Husband Dalton Gomez Is Just Like Magic
- With Oil Sands Ambitions on a Collision Course With Climate Change, Exxon Still Stepping on the Gas
- Job Boom in Michigan, as Clean Energy Manufacturing Drives Economic Recovery
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Scant obesity training in medical school leaves docs ill-prepared to help patients
- A baby spent 36 days at an in-network hospital. Why did her parents get a huge bill?
- Videos like the Tyre Nichols footage can be traumatic. An expert shares ways to cope
Recommendation
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
After Back-to-Back Hurricanes, North Carolina Reconsiders Climate Change
Oklahoma Tries Stronger Measures to Stop Earthquakes in Fracking Areas
15 wishes for 2023: Trailblazers tell how they'd make life on Earth a bit better
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
2017’s Extreme Heat, Flooding Carried Clear Fingerprints of Climate Change
Booming Plastics Industry Faces Backlash as Data About Environmental Harm Grows
Four killer whales spotted together in rare sighting in southern New England waters