Current:Home > InvestJack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court -AssetTrainer
Jack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-17 12:00:31
The U.S. Supreme Court devoted spent more than an hour and a half on Wednesday chewing on a trademark question that pits the iconic Jack Daniel's trademark against a chewy dog toy company that is making money by lampooning the whiskey.
Ultimately the case centers on.....well, dog poop.
Lisa Blatt, the Jack Daniel's lawyer, got right to the point with her opening sentence. "This case involves a dog toy that copies Jack Daniel's trademark and trade dress and associates its whiskey with dog poop," she told the justices.
Indeed, Jack Daniel's is trying to stop the sale of that dog toy, contending that it infringes on its trademark, confuses consumers, and tarnishes its reputation. VIP, the company that manufactures and markets the dog toy, says it is not infringing on the trademark; it's spoofing it.
What the two sides argued
The toy looks like a vinyl version of a Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle, but the label is called Bad Spaniels, features a drawing of a spaniel on the chewy bottle, and instead of promising 40% alcohol by volume, instead promises "43% poo," and "100% smelly." VIP says no reasonable person would confuse the toy with Jack Daniel's. Rather, it says its product is a humorous and expressive work, and thus immune from the whiskey company's charge of patent infringement.
At Wednesday's argument, the justices struggled to reconcile their own previous decisions enforcing the nation's trademark laws and what some of them saw as a potential threat to free speech.
Jack Daniel's argued that a trademark is a property right that by its very nature limits some speech. "A property right by definition in the intellectual property area is one that restricts speech," said Blatt. "You have a limited monopoly on a right to use a name that's associated with your good or service."
Making the contrary argument was VIP's lawyer, Bennet Cooper. "In our popular culture, iconic brands are another kind of celebrity," he said. "People are constitutionally entitled to talk about celebrities and, yes, even make fun of them."
No clear sign from justices
As for the justices, they were all over the place, with conservative Justice Samuel Alito and liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor both asking questions about how the first amendment right of free speech intersects with trademark laws that are meant to protect brands and other intellectual property.
Assume, asked Sotomayor, that someone uses a political party logo, and creates a T-shirt with a picture of an obviously drunk Elephant, and a message that says, "Time to sober up America," and then sells it on Amazon. Isn't that a message protected by the First Amendment?
Justice Alito observed that if there is a conflict between trademark protection and the First Amendment, free speech wins. Beyond that, he said, no CEO would be stupid enough to authorize a dog toy like this one. "Could any reasonable person think that Jack Daniel's had approved this use of the mark?" he asked.
"Absolutely," replied lawyer Blatt, noting that business executives make blunders all the time. But Alito wasn't buying it. "I had a dog. I know something about dogs," he said. "The question is not what the average person would think. It's whether this should be a reasonable person standard, to simplify this whole thing."
But liberal Justice Elena Kagan and conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly looked for an off ramp, a way for this case to be sent back to the lower court with instructions to either screen out or screen in some products when considering trademark infringement.
Kagan in particular did not find the dog toy remotely funny.
"This is a standard commercial product." she said. "This is not a political T-shirt. It's not a film. It's not an artistic photograph. It's nothing of those things."
What's more, she said, "I don't see the parody, but, you know, whatever."
At the end of the day, whatever the court is going to do with this case remained supremely unclear. Indeed, three of the justices were remarkably silent, giving no hints of their thinking whatsoever.
veryGood! (9338)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Angie Harmon Suing Instacart After Deliveryman Shot and Killed Her Dog
- Lawyer for family of slain US Air Force airman says video and calls show deputy went to wrong home
- Colorado teen pleads guilty in rock-throwing spree that killed driver, terrorized others
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Win Big With These Card Games & Board Games That Make for the Best Night-in Ever
- Jurors see gold bars in Bob Menendez bribery trial
- Rock band Cage the Elephant emerge from loss and hospitalization with new album ‘Neon Pill’
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- See photos, videos of barge that struck Pelican Island bridge, causing Texas oil spill
Ranking
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Man convicted of killing 4 people at ex-girlfriend’s home near Denver
- West Virginia miner dies in state’s first reported coal fatality of the year
- Why Nicola Coughlan's Sex Scenes in Bridgerton Season 3 Are a F--k You to Body Shamers
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- How Michael Porter Jr.’s work with a psychotherapist is helping fuel his success
- US military says first aid shipment has been driven across a newly built US pier into the Gaza Strip
- Chris Pratt Speaks Out on Death of His Stunt Double Tony McFarr at 47
Recommendation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
French police fatally shoot a man suspected of planning to set fire to a synagogue
US proposes ending new federal leases in nation’s biggest coal region
It's National Mimosa Day: How to celebrate the cocktail that's often the star of brunch
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Michigan beginning alcohol sales at football games following successful rollouts at its other venues
AP Week in Pictures: Asia
Angie Harmon is suing Instacart and a former shopper who shot and killed her dog, Oliver