Current:Home > NewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -AssetTrainer
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-24 23:39:23
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (775)
Related
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Georgia’s cash hoard approaches $11 billion after a third year of big surpluses
- Blinken calls for protecting civilians as Israel prepares an expected assault on Gaza
- Timothée Chalamet Addresses Desire for Private Life Amid Kylie Jenner Romance
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- 'Take a lesson from the dead': Fatal stabbing of 6-year-old serves warning to divided US
- Here are the key leaders joining the Belt and Road forum and their wish lists to Beijing
- Zipcar fined after allowing customers rent vehicles with open, unrepaired recalls
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Suzanne Somers' Husband Alan Hamel Details Final Moments Before Her Death
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- New Yorkers claimed $1 million prizes from past Powerball, Mega Millions drawings
- Code Switch: Baltimore teens are fighting for environmental justice — and winning
- Brock Bowers has ankle surgery. What it means for Georgia to lose its standout tight end
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Taylor Swift's 'The Eras Tour' dances to No. 1 at the box office, eyeing 'Joker' film record
- 'Love is Blind' Season 5 reunion spoilers: Who's together, who tried again after the pods
- Martin Scorsese is still curious — and still awed by the possibilities of cinema
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Republicans will try to elect Trump ally Rep. Jim Jordan as House speaker but GOP holdouts remain
Gen. David Petraeus: Hamas' attack on Israel was far worse than 9/11
Putin begins visit in China underscoring ties amid Ukraine war and Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Kelly Clarkson is ready to smile again with talk show's move to NYC: 'A weight has lifted'
As Drought Grips the Southwest, Water Utilities Find the Hunt For More Workers Challenging
Versailles Palace evacuated again for security alert amid high vigilance in France against attacks