Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -AssetTrainer
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 13:45:55
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (21)
Related
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Bruce Springsteen's wife Patti Scialfa reveals blood cancer diagnosis
- How many points did Caitlin Clark score today? She's closing in on rookie scoring record
- Cowboys demolish Browns to continue feel-good weekend after cementing Dak Prescott deal
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- The 22 Best Dresses With Pockets Under $40: Banana Republic, Amazon, Old Navy, Target & More
- Authorities vow relentless search as manhunt for interstate shooter enters third day in Kentucky
- Horoscopes Today, September 8, 2024
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- What to know about the video showing Tyre Nichols’ fatal beating by Memphis police officers
Ranking
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Four die in a small plane crash in Vermont
- A look at some of the oldest religious leaders in the world
- Los Angeles Chargers defeat Las Vegas Raiders in Jim Harbaugh's coaching debut with team
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- How to cope after a beloved pet crosses the rainbow bridge | The Excerpt
- Two workers die after being trapped inside a South Dakota farm silo
- Waffle House CEO Walt Ehmer dies at 58 after a long illness
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Kathy Bates Announces Plans to Retire After Acting for More Than 50 Years
New York site chosen for factory to build high-speed trains for Las Vegas-California line
Sky's Angel Reese to have wrist surgery Tuesday, be in cast for six weeks
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Lions defeat Rams in overtime: Highlights, stats from Sunday Night Football
Fake Heiress Anna Delvey Slams Whoopi Goldberg Over Dancing With the Stars Criticism
After 26 years, a Border Patrol agent has a new role: helping migrants | The Excerpt