Current:Home > InvestIt's unlikely, but not impossible, to limit global warming to 1.5 Celsius, study finds -AssetTrainer
It's unlikely, but not impossible, to limit global warming to 1.5 Celsius, study finds
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:50:07
It is unlikely, but not impossible, for humans to hit the lower temperature target set by the landmark 2015 Paris agreement, according to new research conducted by an international group of scientists.
The most catastrophic effects of climate change, such as mass extinction and catastrophic sea level rise, kick in more aggressively if temperatures rise above the Paris agreement targets. The findings are a reminder that, although renewable energy use is increasing, humans are still deeply reliant on fossil fuels and are pumping enormous quantities of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere each year.
The Paris climate agreement set a goal of limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, and ideally no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to average temperatures in the late 1800s. That lower target is looming. The average temperature on Earth over the last decade was about 1.1 degrees Celsius higher than pre-industrial temperatures.
In general, it's easier to use Celsius in this context because both the United Nations and scientists use it. And the target numbers are nice and round. But here's how those numbers look in more-familiar Fahrenheit: humans are trying to limit warming to between about 2.7 and 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and right now we're already at about 2 degrees Fahrenheit of warming.
The new study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, calculates how much carbon dioxide humans can still emit before hitting that 1.5 degree Celsius limit. If humans keep emitting planet-warming greenhouse gasses at the current rate, that threshold will be reached in about six years, the authors find.
"We don't want this to be interpreted as 'six years to save the planet'," says Christopher Smith, a climate scientist at the University of Leeds and one of the authors.
"We do want to underline how close we are to 1.5 degrees [Celsius]," says Smith. In order to have a better than 50% chance of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, humans would need to slash greenhouse gas emissions essentially to zero by around 2035, the study estimates.
That is very unlikely. Even the most ambitious current plans to cut emissions wouldn't result in net zero emissions before about 2050.
But humans still have a lot of power to limit warming, the study underscores. That's because the 1.5 degrees Celsius target is not like a cliff, where humanity is safe on this side of it and doomed on the other.
"If we are able to limit warming to 1.6 degrees or 1.65 degrees or 1.7 degrees [Celsius], that's a lot better than 2 degrees [Celsius]," says Smith. "We still need to fight for every tenth of a degree."
The new estimates do suggest that humans have a little less wiggle room on carbon emissions than previous predictions. However, the six year prediction is still within the range of possibilities predicted by the latest United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, with which the new study shares both authors and methods.
One reason for the slightly more dire estimate is air pollution. When fossil fuels are burned, they release other pollutants alongside carbon dioxide. Some of those pollutants – aerosols – cool off the Earth slightly.
Scientists have known this about aerosols for a long time, but the best estimates of how much aerosols cool things off have slightly increased. That means, as air pollution decreases in the coming years, it could improve human health but will lead to slightly more warming.
veryGood! (8979)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Did AI write this headline?
- All the Stars Who Have Weighed In on the Ozempic Craze
- At COP26, Youth Activists From Around the World Call Out Decades of Delay
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Miss King Charles III's Trooping the Colour Celebration
- Britney Spears' memoir The Woman in Me gets release date
- Glasgow Climate Talks Are, in Many Ways, ‘Harder Than Paris’
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Exxon climate predictions were accurate decades ago. Still it sowed doubt
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Christopher Meloni, Oscar Isaac, Jeff Goldblum and More Internet Zaddies Who Are Also IRL Daddies
- Watch the Moment Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker Revealed They're Expecting
- The Acceleration of an Antarctic Glacier Shows How Global Warming Can Rapidly Break Up Polar Ice and Raise Sea Level
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Having Rolled Back Obama’s Centerpiece Climate Plan, Trump Defends a Vastly More Limited Approach
- Will 2021 Be the Year for Environmental Justice Legislation? States Are Already Leading the Way
- This 22-year-old is trying to save us from ChatGPT before it changes writing forever
Recommendation
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Simon says we're stuck with the debt ceiling (Encore)
Aviation leaders call for more funds for the FAA after this week's system failure
Mary Nichols Was the Early Favorite to Run Biden’s EPA, Before She Became a ‘Casualty’
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Amazon loses bid to overturn historic union win at Staten Island warehouse
Coal-Fired Power Plants Hit a Milestone in Reduced Operation
Mary Nichols Was the Early Favorite to Run Biden’s EPA, Before She Became a ‘Casualty’